Best Cheque Bounce Lawyers in India

3,639 verified cheque bounce advocates across India. Compare experience, courts, languages and client ratings, then contact one directly.

Cheque Bounce

MyLawIndia lists 3,639 advocates practising Cheque Bounce law across India. Profiles below show each advocate's experience, the courts they appear in, languages spoken and client ratings where available, so you can shortlist a few names before making contact. Filter by city to find an advocate handling Cheque Bounce matters near you, and reach out directly by phone or WhatsApp — there is no fee to get in touch through MyLawIndia.

Filters Reset

3,639 advocates

Advocate Sparsh Verma
District & Sessions Court, Panipat
★★★★★ 4.0 (200+)
Cheque Bounce Consumer Court Court Marriage +4
9 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Rohini Singh
District Court Panipat, Panipat
★★★★★ 4.0 (200+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Cheque Bounce +14
12 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Rajamani
HBR Layout, Bangalore / Bengaluru
★★★★★ 4.0 (200+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Cheque Bounce +14
38 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Akhila Kumari
Marathahalli, Bangalore / Bengaluru
★★★★★ 4.0 (200+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Bankruptcy / Insolvency +18
25 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Ajay Singh
Indranagar, Gorakhpur
★★★★★ 4.0 (200+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Cheque Bounce +14
20 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Ratnakar Gaur
Civil Court Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur
★★★★★ 4.0 (200+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Banking / Finance +14
12 yrs experience View Profile

Frequently Asked Questions

You must send a demand notice within 30 days of the bank's dishonour memo, and if unpaid, file the complaint within 30 days after the notice period (15 days) expires — missing these deadlines can bar the case.

Yes, and many are — Section 138 offences are compoundable, meaning the parties can settle at almost any stage and the case can be closed accordingly.

Penalties can include imprisonment of up to two years, a fine of up to twice the cheque amount, or both — though courts frequently favour compensation-focused outcomes over imprisonment.