Best POCSO Act Lawyers in India

4,733 verified pocso act advocates across India. Compare experience, courts, languages and client ratings, then contact one directly.

Pocso Act

MyLawIndia lists 4,733 advocates practising Pocso Act law across India. Profiles below show each advocate's experience, the courts they appear in, languages spoken and client ratings where available, so you can shortlist a few names before making contact. Filter by city to find an advocate handling Pocso Act matters near you, and reach out directly by phone or WhatsApp — there is no fee to get in touch through MyLawIndia.

Filters Reset

4,733 advocates

Pocso Act ✕ Clear all
Advocate Bathe Gowda K V
Tin Factory, Bangalore / Bengaluru
★★★★★ 4.0 (200+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Bankruptcy / Insolvency +17
13 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Akhila Kumari
Marathahalli, Bangalore / Bengaluru
★★★★★ 4.0 (200+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Bankruptcy / Insolvency +18
25 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Ajay Singh
Indranagar, Gorakhpur
★★★★★ 4.0 (200+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Cheque Bounce +14
20 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Ratnakar Gaur
Civil Court Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur
★★★★★ 4.0 (200+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Banking / Finance +14
12 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate BK Arun
Malleshwaram, Bangalore / Bengaluru
★★★★★ 4.0 (200+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Civil +10
13 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Nitish Arora
Near New Courts, Jalandhar
★★★★★ 4.0 (200+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Banking / Finance +12
15 yrs experience View Profile

Frequently Asked Questions

No. Bail provisions under POCSO are significantly stricter than in most criminal matters, and courts examine the evidence closely before granting it. An experienced POCSO lawyer can advise honestly on the likelihood in your specific case.

No, POCSO cases are tried in-camera (closed proceedings) to protect the identity and dignity of the child, and the law also restricts media disclosure of the identity of any child involved.

The Act mandates a time-bound trial, ideally completed within a year of the case being registered, though actual timelines vary by court workload and case complexity.