Best POCSO Act Lawyers in India

4,733 verified pocso act advocates across India. Compare experience, courts, languages and client ratings, then contact one directly.

Pocso Act

MyLawIndia lists 4,733 advocates practising Pocso Act law across India. Profiles below show each advocate's experience, the courts they appear in, languages spoken and client ratings where available, so you can shortlist a few names before making contact. Filter by city to find an advocate handling Pocso Act matters near you, and reach out directly by phone or WhatsApp — there is no fee to get in touch through MyLawIndia.

Filters Reset

4,733 advocates

Pocso Act ✕ Clear all
Advocate Rajesh Ahlawat
District & Sessions Court, Faridabad
★★★★★ 4.0 (2+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Bankruptcy / Insolvency +14
23 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Archana Goyal
Aravali Vihar, sector - 49, Faridabad
★★★★★ 4.0 (2+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Cheque Bounce +15
17 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Ankesh Sethi
Sector 15, Faridabad
★★★★★ 4.0 (2+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Bankruptcy / Insolvency +16
12 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate S.K Bose
Sector 9, Faridabad
★★★★★ 4.0 (2+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Bankruptcy / Insolvency +18
13 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Aamir Khan
Raipur Kalan, Faridabad
★★★★★ 4.0 (2+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Cheque Bounce +16
9 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Anuj Dubey
Sehatpur Extension, Faridabad
★★★★★ 4.0 (2+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Cheque Bounce +12
8 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate S.K. Sharma
District and Sessions Court, Faridabad
★★★★★ 4.0 (2+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Cheque Bounce +11
11 yrs experience View Profile

Frequently Asked Questions

No. Bail provisions under POCSO are significantly stricter than in most criminal matters, and courts examine the evidence closely before granting it. An experienced POCSO lawyer can advise honestly on the likelihood in your specific case.

No, POCSO cases are tried in-camera (closed proceedings) to protect the identity and dignity of the child, and the law also restricts media disclosure of the identity of any child involved.

The Act mandates a time-bound trial, ideally completed within a year of the case being registered, though actual timelines vary by court workload and case complexity.