Best Money Recovery Lawyers in India

1,080 verified recovery advocates across India. Compare experience, courts, languages and client ratings, then contact one directly.

Recovery

MyLawIndia lists 1,080 advocates practising Recovery law across India. Profiles below show each advocate's experience, the courts they appear in, languages spoken and client ratings where available, so you can shortlist a few names before making contact. Filter by city to find an advocate handling Recovery matters near you, and reach out directly by phone or WhatsApp — there is no fee to get in touch through MyLawIndia.

Filters Reset

1,080 advocates

Advocate Malini Jain
High Court, Delhi
★★★★★ 4.0 (60+)
Armed Forces Tribunal Bankruptcy / Insolvency Cheque Bounce +13
8 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate D. Khan
Malviya Nagar, Delhi
★★★★★ 4.0 (70+)
Anticipatory Bail Cheque Bounce Corporate +7
12 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Urvi Syal
Defence Colony, Delhi
★★★★★ 4.0 (10+)
Anticipatory Bail Arbitration Banking / Finance +13
3 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Ankur Thakran
District & Sessions Court, Gurgaon / Gurugram
★★★★★ 4.0 (60+)
Cheque Bounce Child Custody Consumer Court +7
6 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Gurudeep Saini
District and Sessions Court, Gurgaon / Gurugram
★★★★★ 4.0 (20+)
Anti Corruption Cheque Bounce Child Custody +16
4 yrs experience View Profile
Advocate Amit Kumar
District Court, Gurgaon, Gurgaon / Gurugram
★★★★★ 4.0 (100+)
Anti Corruption Anticipatory Bail Court Marriage +13
18 yrs experience View Profile

Frequently Asked Questions

It's not always mandatory but is standard practice — a well-drafted notice often prompts payment without litigation, and also strengthens your position if the matter does go to court.

Most money recovery claims must be filed within three years of the debt becoming due, under the Limitation Act — acting sooner protects your ability to recover the amount.

A summary suit is a faster civil procedure for recovering debts based on a written contract or negotiable instrument, where the defendant has limited scope to delay by raising a defence without court permission.